The Collapse of the Container and the Reality of the Field
2026-01-20
One-Sentence Summary. We argue that the concept of a spatial container is an optical illusion, proposing instead that reality is a self-referential field topology where “objects” are knots and “time” is the metabolic cost of their persistence.
Abstract. We challenge the fundamental assumption that space is a container and matter exists “inside” it. Using the Point–Not–Point (PNP) framework, we demonstrate that “objects” are actually self-confined topological knots in a scalar field. We show that the distinction between “in” and “out” is a phase relationship (\(0\) vs \(\pi\)), not a spatial boundary, and that time is not a background dimension but the byproduct of the field’s persistence.
Keywords. Container Fallacy, Open Box Topology, PNP Framework, Self-Referential Field, Emergent Time, Geometric Mass, Phase Topology
We have spent three hundred years practicing a specific kind of optical illusion.
We look at reality and we see a container. We imagine space as a box, time as a clock on the wall, and matter as the marbles rattling around inside. We assume that if you took the marbles out, the box would remain. We assume that to exist is to be “in” something; or that objects can be peeled off, layer after layer, until a true, unimaginable, nonsensical void remains.
This view is intuitive. It is practical for buying groceries. But as a description of fundamental reality, it is a disaster. It has led physics into a cul-de-sac of dark matter, hidden dimensions, and irreducible paradoxes.
The Point–Not–Point (PNP) framework suggests a different perspective on this topic. There is no container. There is no “in” and there is no “out.”
In other words, the box is open and there is only the field, folding over itself.
The standard model of physics is dualistic. It separates the actor (the particle) from the stage (spacetime).
We define a particle by its position \((x, y, z)\) within the stage. This creates the “problem of the boundary.” If I am here, and the rest of the universe is there, what separates us? A surface? A skin?
If you zoom in on the “surface” of an electron or an atom, you find no hard shell. You find a gradient. The field doesn’t end; it just fades. The “object” is not a distinct thing sitting in space; it is a region where the electromagnetic field is doing something specific.
Imagine a Möbius strip [1]. It looks like a loop and it has a surface. But if you trace a line along the “inside” of the “loop,” you eventually find yourself on the “outside” without ever crossing an edge.
In this topology, “inside” and “outside” are not locations; they are phases of a process, relative, opposite sides of the same coin.
The field flows through the core, twists by \(\pi\) radians, and re-emerges. The particle is not in the universe. The distinction between the object and the environment is purely a matter of phase relation.
If there is no container to hold the energy, why doesn’t the energy simply dissipate? Why do “objects” stay objects?
The fundamental unit of propagation is a wave that is trying to escape. In a linear system (light), it flies away at the speed of light (\(c\)). But in the fundamental \((1)\) mode, the propagation path is closed.
The energy tries to escape. It pushes “outward.” But because of the phase-twisted geometry, “outward” eventually curves back into “inward.” The wave encounters its own tail.
It has nowhere to go but unto itself.
This is not a cage made of bars. It is a cage made of geometry. The energy is trapped by its own trajectory. This localized self-interaction creates the resistance we call mass. The “object” is the region where the field is trapped circling around itself, in this self-referential bounce.
This self-confinement generates the experience of time [2].
For the field to stay trapped in this loop, it cannot stand still. A static field has no momentum flux, which means it cannot balance the internal stress of the knot. To persist, the field must evolve.
The mathematical operator that drives this evolution is called the propagator [2]. To avoid dissipating, the field must continue its phase inversion to propagate onto itself. It has no option but to evolve, from state \(t\) to state \(t+\Delta t\).
Time is thus the byproduct of the need of energy to keep flowing and to persist. The propagator just encodes this mathematically and justifies it topologically —by the shape of its mere existence as a self-sustaining propagating loop of energy.
It is not a river that carries us; it is the sequence of necessary configurations the field must adopt to maintain its existence.
We intuitively tend to define our existence by separation. We locate ourselves in a room, on a planet, drifting through time in a void. We assume a fundamental spatial distance between the observer and everything else.
We have shown a perspective where the “box” is an illusion, and “objects” are self-trapped energy circling around itself, and “time” is a byproduct of its persisted flow that guarantees its continued existence.
We are not in. We are not out. We are.
Freet, M., Hale, A., Rodriguez, A. M. (2025). The In–Out Self-Referential Field Vibration. Preferred Frame Lab. https://writing.preferredframe.com/doi/10.5281/zenodo.18317581
Nedrock, F., et al. (2025). The PNP Theory of Cause and Effect. Preferred Frame Lab. https://writing.preferredframe.com/doi/10.5281/zenodo.18317319
Rodriguez, A. M., et al. (2026). The Principle of Topological Constraint. https://writing.preferredframe.com/doi/10.5281/zenodo.18318076
Palma, A., et al. (2025). Deriving the Schrödinger Equation from Source-Free Maxwell Dynamics. https://writing.preferredframe.com/doi/10.5281/zenodo.18316984